<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canada&#8217;s housing bubble &#8211; time to take away the punch bowl</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wellingtonfund.com/blog/2009/12/23/canadas-housing-bubble-time-to-take-away-the-punch-bowl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wellingtonfund.com/blog/2009/12/23/canadas-housing-bubble-time-to-take-away-the-punch-bowl/</link>
	<description>News, Views &#38; Purviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 02:44:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark McQueen</title>
		<link>http://www.wellingtonfund.com/blog/2009/12/23/canadas-housing-bubble-time-to-take-away-the-punch-bowl/comment-page-1/#comment-2206</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark McQueen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wellingtonfund.com/blog/?p=3088#comment-2206</guid>
		<description>Thanks for stopping by our site, Pedro

I think these facts are well understood.

Cheers

MRM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for stopping by our site, Pedro</p>
<p>I think these facts are well understood.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>MRM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedro</title>
		<link>http://www.wellingtonfund.com/blog/2009/12/23/canadas-housing-bubble-time-to-take-away-the-punch-bowl/comment-page-1/#comment-2205</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wellingtonfund.com/blog/?p=3088#comment-2205</guid>
		<description>Just so you know - the CMHC does not issue mortgages nor does it set the minimum down payment requirements. CMHC provides insures mortgages with less than 20% down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just so you know &#8211; the CMHC does not issue mortgages nor does it set the minimum down payment requirements. CMHC provides insures mortgages with less than 20% down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doctor stock</title>
		<link>http://www.wellingtonfund.com/blog/2009/12/23/canadas-housing-bubble-time-to-take-away-the-punch-bowl/comment-page-1/#comment-2033</link>
		<dc:creator>doctor stock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 04:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wellingtonfund.com/blog/?p=3088#comment-2033</guid>
		<description>Exactly...the pre-tax perspective is critical to getting a true read on the numbers.  Thanks and Merry Christmas all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly&#8230;the pre-tax perspective is critical to getting a true read on the numbers.  Thanks and Merry Christmas all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TH</title>
		<link>http://www.wellingtonfund.com/blog/2009/12/23/canadas-housing-bubble-time-to-take-away-the-punch-bowl/comment-page-1/#comment-2031</link>
		<dc:creator>TH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 20:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wellingtonfund.com/blog/?p=3088#comment-2031</guid>
		<description>Mark,

Great post. Every Canadian blogger that I regularly follow is commenting on the BoC/FM comment, but only you have put this right perspective with regards to what this means for &#039;Pre-tax&#039; perspective. This mirrors my thoughts and advice to my friends and colleagues on the topic.

I cannot understand how many of my very educated colleagues(who are financial bankers) don&#039;t factor this issue in their own real-estate   investments. 

It is so easy when the cost is broken down into a per-month basis to reduce the $$ impact. For example, $50/mth cell phone, $25/mth security monitoring, etc and using &quot;oh, I can afford that!&quot; justification without paying attention to what it really costs on an Annual basis and let alone what this means on a pre-tax income level.
 
I am &#039;in the market&#039; for a house since I sold my place earlier this year, but despite having the possibly one of the best credit (Zero Debt, &gt;150K income, stable job)I cant stomach the current housing prices that sellers are demanding and getting. This past summer I saw many families bidding up the house prices using the same justification of &quot;$20 per month of high mortgage payment on that extra 10K- I can afford that&quot;. 

I guess I will happily be renting for some more time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>Great post. Every Canadian blogger that I regularly follow is commenting on the BoC/FM comment, but only you have put this right perspective with regards to what this means for &#8216;Pre-tax&#8217; perspective. This mirrors my thoughts and advice to my friends and colleagues on the topic.</p>
<p>I cannot understand how many of my very educated colleagues(who are financial bankers) don&#8217;t factor this issue in their own real-estate   investments. </p>
<p>It is so easy when the cost is broken down into a per-month basis to reduce the $$ impact. For example, $50/mth cell phone, $25/mth security monitoring, etc and using &#8220;oh, I can afford that!&#8221; justification without paying attention to what it really costs on an Annual basis and let alone what this means on a pre-tax income level.</p>
<p>I am &#8216;in the market&#8217; for a house since I sold my place earlier this year, but despite having the possibly one of the best credit (Zero Debt, &gt;150K income, stable job)I cant stomach the current housing prices that sellers are demanding and getting. This past summer I saw many families bidding up the house prices using the same justification of &#8220;$20 per month of high mortgage payment on that extra 10K- I can afford that&#8221;. </p>
<p>I guess I will happily be renting for some more time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad J.</title>
		<link>http://www.wellingtonfund.com/blog/2009/12/23/canadas-housing-bubble-time-to-take-away-the-punch-bowl/comment-page-1/#comment-2027</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 13:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wellingtonfund.com/blog/?p=3088#comment-2027</guid>
		<description>Mark, I really have a tough time when inflammatory words like &quot;bubble&quot; are used to describe the Canadian housing market.

Our variable mortgages are nothing like American ARMs.  Our 35-year am periods are nothing like American zero and negative am mortgages that fuelled unsustainable valuations.  Our interest payments are not tax-deductable.

Real estate is cheap in Toronto compared to other global cities.  A professional couple can still buy a house in Leslieville or Trinity-Bellwoods for around 3.0-3.5x income (150K income/$450-525K house) without resorting to an am period beyond 25 years.  As long as there are professionals in Toronto, there will be demand.

Just out of business school we purchased a modest rowhosue in downtown east.  I can walk to Bay St in under 25 minutes and our mortgage is &quot;normal&quot; (25y am, fixed at c.5%, c.75% LTV).  I can&#039;t think of another global financial hub where an early career guy like myself could easily afford real estate in the city centre.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, I really have a tough time when inflammatory words like &quot;bubble&quot; are used to describe the Canadian housing market.</p>
<p>Our variable mortgages are nothing like American ARMs.  Our 35-year am periods are nothing like American zero and negative am mortgages that fuelled unsustainable valuations.  Our interest payments are not tax-deductable.</p>
<p>Real estate is cheap in Toronto compared to other global cities.  A professional couple can still buy a house in Leslieville or Trinity-Bellwoods for around 3.0-3.5x income (150K income/$450-525K house) without resorting to an am period beyond 25 years.  As long as there are professionals in Toronto, there will be demand.</p>
<p>Just out of business school we purchased a modest rowhosue in downtown east.  I can walk to Bay St in under 25 minutes and our mortgage is &quot;normal&quot; (25y am, fixed at c.5%, c.75% LTV).  I can&#8217;t think of another global financial hub where an early career guy like myself could easily afford real estate in the city centre.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

