<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solving the Start-up &amp; VC malaise part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wellingtonfund.com/blog/2008/02/06/solving-the-start-up-vc-malaise-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wellingtonfund.com/blog/2008/02/06/solving-the-start-up-vc-malaise-part-2/</link>
	<description>News, Views &#38; Purviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 02:44:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AT</title>
		<link>http://www.wellingtonfund.com/blog/2008/02/06/solving-the-start-up-vc-malaise-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-740</link>
		<dc:creator>AT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 19:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wellingtonfund.com/blog/2008/02/06/solving-the-start-up-vc-malaise-part-2/#comment-740</guid>
		<description>Since it was so politely demanded...

Most of this isn&#039;t rocket science (unless you are invested in Gary Snoman&#039;s latest fund YouTube - Gary Snoman 2007), but it is pretty darn close.  Most new technologies are very hard to develop. It take a lot of smart people, deep pocketed investors who can stomach the risk, and a supportive government and regulatory environment.  Anything that helps one of these three categories is a good idea in my books.  

I would also say that there is a fundamental accounting problem for start-up companies.  Your largest expense is by far your people... but they are also your greatest asset.  Accounting doesn&#039;t really have a method of capturing this.  If 20 engineers work for an entire year, are paid, say $2M, they most have created something valuable? If it is worth $1 or $100M, it is worth something... but, most of the time, there is no asset recorded on the balance sheet.  

In our current knowledge based economy, I think the sophisticated folks at Wellington Financial have figured this out, and are more than happy to support companies with this type of IP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since it was so politely demanded&#8230;</p>
<p>Most of this isn&#8217;t rocket science (unless you are invested in Gary Snoman&#8217;s latest fund YouTube &#8211; Gary Snoman 2007), but it is pretty darn close.  Most new technologies are very hard to develop. It take a lot of smart people, deep pocketed investors who can stomach the risk, and a supportive government and regulatory environment.  Anything that helps one of these three categories is a good idea in my books.  </p>
<p>I would also say that there is a fundamental accounting problem for start-up companies.  Your largest expense is by far your people&#8230; but they are also your greatest asset.  Accounting doesn&#8217;t really have a method of capturing this.  If 20 engineers work for an entire year, are paid, say $2M, they most have created something valuable? If it is worth $1 or $100M, it is worth something&#8230; but, most of the time, there is no asset recorded on the balance sheet.  </p>
<p>In our current knowledge based economy, I think the sophisticated folks at Wellington Financial have figured this out, and are more than happy to support companies with this type of IP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad J.</title>
		<link>http://www.wellingtonfund.com/blog/2008/02/06/solving-the-start-up-vc-malaise-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-738</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 13:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wellingtonfund.com/blog/2008/02/06/solving-the-start-up-vc-malaise-part-2/#comment-738</guid>
		<description>I have limited experience on the small/venture scale of lending, so I will ask a question instead of giving an answer.  

In areas or countries that are proven centres for innovation, what do they have that we lack?  I&#039;m thinking of VC/tech meccas like Boston-Cambridge, Silicon Valley, Sweden, Norway, et al.

With the way things are going in Waterloo I&#039;m thinking the VCs should start sponsoring under-25 poker players from UW.  If 3 in 10 win big you&#039;ll still get the RoC to keep your investors happy, no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have limited experience on the small/venture scale of lending, so I will ask a question instead of giving an answer.  </p>
<p>In areas or countries that are proven centres for innovation, what do they have that we lack?  I&#8217;m thinking of VC/tech meccas like Boston-Cambridge, Silicon Valley, Sweden, Norway, et al.</p>
<p>With the way things are going in Waterloo I&#8217;m thinking the VCs should start sponsoring under-25 poker players from UW.  If 3 in 10 win big you&#8217;ll still get the RoC to keep your investors happy, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

